Concerns Raised Over EO 62 Leadership Retention
Former agriculture officials have voiced strong concerns about the recent decision to retain key cabinet members linked to Executive Order No. 62. This executive order, signed by the current administration, significantly reduced tariffs on imported rice, pork, and corn. Critics argue that this policy threatens the welfare of Filipino farmers, who face steep costs and competition from cheaper imports.
One former agriculture secretary lamented the apparent sidelining of farmers in the government’s ongoing leadership reshuffle. “The main proponents of Executive Order No. 62 (which drastically reduced tariff protection for rice, pork, and corn producers) have not been held accountable for their failed policy advice,” he said. This statement highlights growing frustration among agricultural sectors that feel overlooked during critical policy decisions.
Impact of EO 62 on Filipino Farmers
EO 62 was introduced as a strategy to lower food inflation by cutting tariff rates on essential agricultural products. However, local farmers and industry stakeholders warn that the policy may worsen their economic challenges. Many producers are struggling with high production costs while facing an influx of cheaper imported goods. As a result, the policy risks deepening the hardships of rural communities dependent on farming.
Despite these concerns, farmer representatives appear to have been excluded from discussions about recent cabinet changes. “Unfortunately, it seems that the country’s farmers are not being consulted in the ongoing Cabinet changes,” the former official noted. This exclusion has intensified calls for a more inclusive approach to agricultural policymaking.
Retention of Economic Managers Behind EO 62
The latest cabinet reshuffle saw the reappointment of key economic figures believed to have played a major role in shaping EO 62. Among these are the heads of the National Economic and Development Authority and the Finance Department. Their continued presence in the administration is viewed by some as a move to maintain stability in economic planning and fiscal management.
However, agricultural groups argue that economic growth should not come at the expense of the farming sector’s sustainability. They stress the need for policies that balance inflation control with protecting local producers’ livelihoods. The ongoing debate underscores the challenges of addressing food security while supporting rural economies.
Calls for Greater Farmer Participation
Community leaders and stakeholders urge the government to incorporate farmers’ voices in future policy decisions. They believe that meaningful engagement could lead to more balanced and effective agricultural reforms. In particular, they advocate for reviewing tariff policies to ensure they do not disadvantage local producers.
As of now, official responses from the administration regarding these concerns remain pending. Meanwhile, the dialogue between economic managers and agricultural advocates continues to shape the discourse on the nation’s food policy and rural development.
For more news and updates on Executive Order No. 62, visit Filipinokami.com.