Controversy Surrounding Sara Duterte’s Absence
ACT Teachers party-list Rep. Antonio Tinio has criticized Vice President Sara Duterte’s office and her supporters for invoking the Cebu earthquake to explain her absence during the House of Representatives budget debates. According to Tinio, the Cebu earthquake excuse was used as a justification, but the real reason was her lack of intention to attend the sessions.
Claims on Cebu Earthquake and Attendance
In a recent ambush interview, Tinio emphasized that while the earthquake in Cebu was indeed a significant event, it should not have been a reason to skip the budget debates. Officials reported that Duterte’s team appeared to leverage the disaster as a cover-up for her absence. Community members noted that this raised questions about her commitment to legislative duties.
Political Reactions and Implications
Local leaders expressed concern over the use of the Cebu earthquake to justify nonattendance in critical government proceedings. Some sources said this move undermines the importance of the budget debates, which are crucial for national development. Others highlighted that public officials must balance crisis response with legislative responsibilities.
Calls for Accountability and Transparency
Observers urged Vice President Duterte’s office to clarify the reasons behind her absence beyond citing the Cebu earthquake. They stressed that transparency is essential to maintain public trust, especially when natural disasters are involved. Officials reported that lawmakers expect accountability from all government representatives during crucial sessions.
Conclusion
The debate surrounding Sara Duterte’s absence during the House budget debates continues to draw attention. The use of the Cebu earthquake as justification has been met with skepticism by various political figures. As the discussion unfolds, many await further explanations to understand the true circumstances behind her absence.
For more news and updates on Cebu earthquake, visit Filipinokami.com.
