Supreme Court Affirms Legitimacy of Legitimized Children
The Supreme Court has clarified that children who were legitimated by the subsequent marriage of their parents maintain their legitimacy status, even if the marriage is later declared null and void. This ruling confirms that the legitimacy of these children does not revert to illegitimacy despite the annulment of their parents’ union.
According to the court, “Once a child is legitimated under the Family Code, there is no legal basis for changing the status back to illegitimate. Allowing this would go against the law’s intent to protect the child’s best interests.” This reinforces the principle that protecting the child’s status is paramount.
Legal Basis for Maintaining Legitimacy After Nullity
The court emphasized that for purposes of legitimacy, there is no significant difference between children who are legitimate from birth and those who are legitimated through the marriage of their parents. This applies even when the marriage is later declared void due to psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code.
The ruling cited Article 54 of the Family Code, explaining, “A declaration of nullity of marriage based on the psychological incapacity of one or both spouses under Article 36 should not affect the status of the children.” The court’s decision overturns a previous regional trial court order that had declared a child illegitimate following the nullity of her parents’ marriage.
Case Background and Court’s Rationale
The case involved a child born several months before her parents married. The mother petitioned for the nullity of marriage, citing physical, emotional, and verbal abuse, along with her husband’s issues with alcohol, gambling, and infidelity. The regional trial court granted the nullity petition, declaring the marriage void due to psychological incapacity.
However, the same court ruled that the child was illegitimate because she was born before the marriage and her birth certificate lacked a formal annotation of legitimation. The Office of the Solicitor General challenged this ruling, arguing that the child’s legitimacy was valid despite the absence of the annotation.
The Supreme Court sided with the OSG, affirming the child’s legitimate status. It noted, “The Family Code does not provide for a scenario where a legitimated child may revert to illegitimacy. This is in keeping with the principle that a legitimate status is more favorable to the child.”
Legal Protections for Children’s Status
The court further explained that the law presumes legitimacy to protect innocent children and uphold natural justice. The legitimacy status grants children certain rights, and it would be unjust to strip them of these rights after being legitimated.
The ruling also clarified that the lack of annotation on the birth certificate is an administrative issue and does not affect the substantive rights granted by the Family Code. Thus, the trial court’s ruling declaring the child illegitimate was reversed.
Implications of the Supreme Court Decision
This decision underscores the legal stance that children’s best interests come first, especially regarding their status and rights. It sets a clear precedent that nullifying a marriage due to psychological incapacity will not undermine the legitimacy of children born before or during that marriage.
This protects children from the stigma and legal disadvantages of illegitimacy, reinforcing the idea that the law favors maintaining a child’s legitimate status once established.
For more news and updates on legitimacy and family law, visit Filipinokami.com.