US Travel Advisory and Philippine Response
Cagayan de Oro City’s 2nd district representative Rufus Rodriguez has strongly criticized the recent US travel advisory warning Americans about safety concerns in the Philippines. He described the advisory as an “unfair, shotgun warning,” emphasizing that many areas in the Philippines remain safe for tourists. Rodriguez urged a thorough review of the advisory, stressing that the Philippines does not deserve such treatment from its closest ally.
He called on the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) to summon the US Ambassador in Manila for clarification. Rodriguez also appealed to President Marcos to task the DFA, the Philippine Ambassador to the US, and the Department of Tourism (DOT) to explain their actions following the advisory issued on May 8, 2025. He warned that the advisory damages the country’s reputation internationally and could discourage not only American visitors but tourists from around the world. Rodriguez added, “It is likewise particularly biased against our beloved island, Mindanao.”
Details of the US Travel Advisory
The US State Department placed the Philippines under a “Level 2: Exercise Increased Caution” travel advisory. The advisory highlights concerns about crime, terrorism, civil unrest, and kidnapping in various regions. It explicitly warns against travel to the Sulu Archipelago and Marawi City, Mindanao, citing serious risks including terrorism and kidnapping.
Other parts of Mindanao are under a “Level 3: Reconsider Travel” classification, while Marawi City and the Sulu Archipelago are labeled “Level 4: Do Not Travel.” The advisory explains that terrorists and armed groups have targeted public spaces such as tourist sites, markets, and government offices. Furthermore, violent crimes like robbery and physical assaults are common. It also notes that protests in the Philippines might turn violent, causing disruptions and limited local government response capacity.
Impact on Tourism and Government Reaction
The advisory advises US government employees to seek special authorization before traveling to certain parts of the Philippines. It warns that the US government has limited ability to assist citizens in emergency situations in high-risk areas.
Local authorities and tourism stakeholders are concerned about the potential economic impact. The warning could reduce the number of visitors, hurting a sector vital to the country’s livelihood. Community leaders and officials have called for a united response to address these concerns and improve the country’s image abroad.
Call for Dialogue and Review
In response to the advisory, sources familiar with the matter indicate that Philippine officials are preparing to engage with US representatives. The goal is to clarify the situation and work toward a more balanced and accurate assessment of safety conditions. This effort is crucial to reassure tourists and maintain strong bilateral relations.
Rodriguez’s firm stance underscores the urgency for the government to act decisively. His call to President Marcos and relevant agencies reflects a broader demand for transparency and proactive measures to safeguard the Philippines’ reputation as a travel destination.
For more news and updates on US travel advisory, visit Filipinokami.com.