Navotas Rep Highlights P13.8 Billion Insertions
Navotas City Representative Toby Tiangco once again brought attention to the P13.8 billion insertions allegedly made by then-House appropriations committee chair Zaldy Co in the 2025 national budget. These significant budget insertions were reportedly linked to various flood control projects, raising concerns among lawmakers and the public.
During the Senate blue ribbon panel’s third hearing on Monday, focused on anomalous flood control projects, Tiangco presented evidence from a flash drive previously barred from presentation at the House of Representatives hearing on September 2. This move shed new light on the matter, intensifying scrutiny over the budget allocations.
Senate Inquiry Probes Sole Proponent of Budget Insertions
Panel chair Senator Rodante Marcoleta questioned Tiangco about whether his investigation identified Zaldy Co as the sole proponent of the P13.8 billion insertions in the 2025 budget.
“For the record… based on the information you have gathered, it appears that Rep. Zaldy Co is the proponent of nearly P13.8 billion — we cannot determine whether this was ‘parked’ or ‘forced upon,’ is that our conclusion?” Marcoleta asked in Filipino.
Tiangco clarified that his statement was based strictly on his findings. “Because I asked some congressmen about it, and they said: That’s not ours, we didn’t request that. So I didn’t ask anymore whether it was ‘parked’ or ‘forced upon.’ What I’m simply saying is that’s what I saw. Normally, if I requested it, I should be the proponent and it should also be in my congressional district. If those don’t match, then you would wonder why,” he explained in Filipino.
Explaining “Parking” and “Sagasa” Funds
In earlier disclosures, Tiangco introduced the terms “parking” and “sagasa” funds to explain dubious budget practices. He noted that “parking” refers to situations where a congressman asks a district to temporarily hold or “park” funds. Meanwhile, “sagasa” funds are allocated to a district regardless of the district’s consent or request.
These practices, officials reported, complicate transparency and accountability in budget allocation, especially when funds are linked to critical projects like flood control.
Calls for Greater Transparency in Flood Control Budget
Community members and local leaders expressed concern over the large-scale budget insertions and the unclear processes behind them. The flood control projects, vital for disaster-prone areas, demand strict oversight to ensure funds are used appropriately and effectively.
With the Senate continuing its investigation, many hope these revelations will lead to reforms that prevent misuse of public funds and promote genuine development in vulnerable communities.
For more news and updates on flood control projects, visit Filipinokami.com.
